3pacccccc commented on PR #24702: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24702#issuecomment-3269433654
> LGTM Why did the original design require two listener interfaces, `DecryptFailListener ` and `ReaderDecryptFailListener ` , why not only `DecryptFailListener `? Thank you so much for reviewing @Technoboy- This is to maintain consistency with the existing listener patterns - we have separate messageListener for Consumer and readerListener for Reader, so I created corresponding decryptFailListener and readerDecryptFailListener to match this naming convention. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
