[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14198513#comment-14198513
]
Chris Riccomini commented on SAMZA-421:
---------------------------------------
Hmm. 10% seems quite high. Seems like a timer shouldn't make things 10% slower.
Let me do a similar test with TestSamzaContainerPerformance.
Question: when you say that updateTimer took 10%, do you mean that the
operation *inside* updateTimer took 10%, or that the overhead of the
updateTimer (excluding the actual operation that the timer is wrapping) method
was 10%?
> Test the performance before and after adding the Timer metric
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-421
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-421
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: metrics
> Reporter: Yan Fang
> Assignee: Yan Fang
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: testTimer1.png
>
>
> As
> [recommended|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-349?focusedCommentId=14128365&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14128365]
> by Martin in SAMZA-349, it's worth testing the performance before and after
> implementing the Timer metric.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
