SEZ9 commented on issue #11769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11769#issuecomment-5358317845

   Thanks @goutamadwant, that is exactly the regression target we discussed. A 
two-table writer test that simulates `08S01`, fails on the stale statement 
during buffer replay, reconnects the active writer, rebuilds statements, and 
asserts both buffered rows are written exactly once covers the gap I described 
for the multi-table + `generate_sink_sql = true` path. The fact that the test 
fails when the #9942 handling is removed is a good signal that it is actually 
pinning the behavior we want. I will review #11879.
   
   @NaughtyYang, could you please retry the original failing job against 
current `dev` (or a release containing #9942 and #10793) and report back 
whether the `08S01 -> reconnect -> statement closed on replay` failure still 
reproduces? That result decides whether this issue can be closed once #11879 
lands, or whether there is still a functional gap beyond missing test coverage.
   
   @zhang-arvin, thanks for offering to help. Since @goutamadwant has already 
opened #11879 for the regression test, please coordinate with them there rather 
than starting parallel work. If NaughtyYang's retry shows the failure still 
reproduces on current `dev`, there will be a functional fix to pick up on top 
of that test.
   
   Concrete remaining asks:
   1. @NaughtyYang: retry against current `dev` and share the result (logs if 
it still fails);
   2. review of #11879 to confirm it targets the exact multi-table + 
`generate_sink_sql = true` replay path;
   3. keep this issue open until both the retry result and the regression test 
are in.
   
   #11771 stays scoped to the `connection-test-query` pool-validation 
prevention path as agreed earlier in this thread.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:388 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to