DanielLeens commented on PR #13040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13040#issuecomment-6473737271

   Thanks for the detailed follow-up. Keeping the catalog/sink-documentation 
change separate until #13023 lands is reasonable; the redundant assertion was 
optional. Since you have already rerun the failed unit-test job, please let 
that existing attempt finish rather than starting an overlapping run. I also 
need to qualify my earlier sync advice: the candidate HTTPS/REST test-port 
fixes #13028 and #13030 are still open, so syncing dev alone is not a 
demonstrated cure for the Hazelcast startup timeout. If that same job still 
fails, link its new result; no unrelated Databend dependency or module patch is 
requested.
   
   Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T15:51:57+00:00), head 
`51f068a1b4cadff094db8ea2cbae82d1aace3bb9`: 
[Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122905859469) is `IN_PROGRESS`.
   
   An exact-head Build is already pending/in progress. Let that existing run 
finish; no overlapping rerun or source change is requested on the strength of 
branch drift.
   
   My [previous source 
conclusion](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13040#pullrequestreview-5681309667)
 remains clear for the reviewed scope. CI is not being passed by inference, and 
this follow-up is not an effective approval.
   
   Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 1 / behind 
7, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional 
sync request.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to