slyubomirsky commented on PR #16687: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/16687#issuecomment-2005538759
Oh my mistake, a year ago we actually said that trying to infer it is what we would want. See meeting notes from Feb. 28, 2023 (I can't put in a link to a specific heading). This would be consistent with what we talked about so we should give consideration to the approach of marking unknown purity. I think it's a good idea and certainly worth discussing, though it would mean that we might have to rerun the pass at different points. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
