jcf94 commented on a change in pull request #7185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7185#discussion_r551179115
##########
File path: python/tvm/auto_scheduler/measure.py
##########
@@ -624,12 +652,10 @@ def local_build_worker(args):
The build result of this Builder thread.
"""
inp, build_func, timeout, verbose = args
- if build_func == "default":
- build_func = tar.tar
- elif build_func == "ndk":
- build_func = ndk.create_shared
- else:
- raise ValueError("Invalid build_func" + build_func)
+ assert build_func == BuildFunc.name, (
+ "BuildFunc.name: " + BuildFunc.name + ", but args is: " + build_func
+ )
+ build_func = BuildFunc.build_func
Review comment:
Ok, then I dont have other better opinions, I'm going to do some test on
arm cpus these days, maybe I'll encounter similar problem like you.
Is it possible to:
```python
use_ndk = True
@tvm._ffi.register_func("special_wrapper")
def _wrapper():
return cc.cross_compiler(ndk.create_shared, options=ndk_options)
build_func = "special_wrapper"
tuner = auto_scheduler.TaskScheduler(tasks, task_weights)
tune_option = auto_scheduler.TuningOptions(
num_measure_trials=200, # change this to 20000 to achieve the best
performance
builder=auto_scheduler.LocalBuilder(build_func=build_func if use_ndk
else "default"),
runner=auto_scheduler.RPCRunner(
device_key, host=tracker_ip, port=tracker_port, repeat=3, timeout=50
),
measure_callbacks=[auto_scheduler.RecordToFile(log_file)],
)
```
?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
