[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670800#action_12670800
 ] 

Ate Douma commented on WICKET-2078:
-----------------------------------

That's really odd. It seems not only the query part of the WicketURL parameter 
is "lost", but the parameter all together.
Can you log the target WicketURL renderParameter just before the call to 
response.setRenderParameter(redirectUrlKey, wicketURL) to show what it *should* 
return in the WicketPortlet.processActionResponseState method?
Do log both the redirectUrlKey and the wicketURL in that case. No matter what, 
Websphere Portal *should* return those values if set through 
ActionResponse.setRenderParameter

As the whole parameter isn't returned somehow though, it might be something 
with the redirectUrlKey itself. By default, that is created from 
"_wu"+request.getPortletMode().
Not sure, but maybe Websphere Portal doesn't like parameters starting with an 
"_"?
You could try a different ("normal") prefix and see if that helps.

> WICKET-2058 does not support IBM Websphere Portal Server 6.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-2078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2078
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket-portlet
>         Environment: WebSphere Platform 6.1 [ND 6.1.0.15 cf150808.12]  
>            Reporter: Hardi Probst
>            Assignee: Ate Douma
>         Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> First of all I want to say thanks a lot for resolving the issue WICKET-2058 
> to Ate, Thijs and Antony!
> I checked out the revision 739543 from trunk and experimented/tested a lot 
> with the wicket examples within IBM Websphere Portal 6.1.
> I had to add the following lines into web.xml to get the first 
> example-portlets visible in my browser:
>   <context-param>
>     <param-name>org.apache.wicket.detectPortletContext</param-name>
>     <param-value>true</param-value>
>   </context-param>
> The next problem I stumbled over was that the generated links (e.g. 
> BookmarkablePageLink<Void>("link", PageXY.class) ) did not work at all.
> I traced the problem down to the point that the generated wicketURL in 
> PortletRequestContext.encodeRenderURL includes all query-parameters but the 
> PortletFilter does 
> not get them as parameters, just the path-part.
> WicketPortlet.processRequest:
>       PortletRequestDispatcher rd = 
> getPortletContext().getRequestDispatcher(wicketURL);
>       if (rd != null)
>       {
>               // delegate to wicket filter - this is where the magic happens
>               rd.include(request, response);
>               ...
> Let's assume wicketURL has the value of 
> "/repeater/?wicket:interface=:8:oir:17:toggleHighlite:2:ILinkListener::", the 
> result would be the same as the value of "/repeater/".
> I was able to fix it by applying the query parameters as "real" parameters to 
> the javax.portlet.PortletURL for Action and Render-URLs (see Patch for 
> PortletRequestContext).
> After that I had the same problem with form-submission. The form-values came 
> in perfectly to the model, but after leaving the ACTION-PHASE the state was 
> all gone in RENDER-PHASE. 
> So I did the same in WicketPortlet.processActionResponseState and applied all 
> wicketURL-query parameteters to the response (setRenderParameter). see Patch 
> for WicketPortlet.
> Another solution could be a PortletRequestWrapper within the WicketFilter 
> implementation. Or does anybody have a better idea?
> It would be really great to see this issue fixed in wicket 1.4!
> I'll keep on testing the next days with the ajax examples (some worked 
> already with the provided patch applied) and WPS 6.1...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to