[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720017#action_12720017 ]
Hardi Probst commented on WICKET-2078: -------------------------------------- >From my point of view the IBM-suggestion does not address this issue. I >believe the problem is that the IBM implementation treats action and render >requests differently. For example when you trigger an action in a test portlet: public void processAction(ActionRequest request, ActionResponse response) throws PortletException, java.io.IOException { String rdInput="/JSR286ParameterRDAction/"+ "?param1=111¶m2=222"; PortletRequestDispatcher rd = getPortletContext().getRequestDispatcher( rdInput ); rd.include(request,response); } you wont get the parameters in the servlet-filter mapped to "/JSR286ParameterRDAction/*": public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException { int parameterCount=request.getParameterMap().size() ; } the value of "parameterCount" must be 2 in this example, but with WPS 6.1.0.23 it is 0! when you do the same from a render request you get the expected result of 2. I also tested it with the IBM-suggestion: public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException { PortletRequest portletRequest= (PortletRequest) request.getAttribute("javax.portlet.request"); int parameterCount=portletRequest.getParameterMap().size() ; } But it makes no difference (parameterCount is also 0 ), and I think thats the correct and expected value but helps nothing to fix this issue! > WICKET-2058 does not support IBM Websphere Portal Server 6.1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WICKET-2078 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2078 > Project: Wicket > Issue Type: Bug > Components: wicket-portlet > Environment: WebSphere Platform 6.1 [ND 6.1.0.15 cf150808.12] > Reporter: Hardi Probst > Assignee: Ate Douma > Attachments: patch.txt, patch2.txt > > > First of all I want to say thanks a lot for resolving the issue WICKET-2058 > to Ate, Thijs and Antony! > I checked out the revision 739543 from trunk and experimented/tested a lot > with the wicket examples within IBM Websphere Portal 6.1. > I had to add the following lines into web.xml to get the first > example-portlets visible in my browser: > <context-param> > <param-name>org.apache.wicket.detectPortletContext</param-name> > <param-value>true</param-value> > </context-param> > The next problem I stumbled over was that the generated links (e.g. > BookmarkablePageLink<Void>("link", PageXY.class) ) did not work at all. > I traced the problem down to the point that the generated wicketURL in > PortletRequestContext.encodeRenderURL includes all query-parameters but the > PortletFilter does > not get them as parameters, just the path-part. > WicketPortlet.processRequest: > PortletRequestDispatcher rd = > getPortletContext().getRequestDispatcher(wicketURL); > if (rd != null) > { > // delegate to wicket filter - this is where the magic happens > rd.include(request, response); > ... > Let's assume wicketURL has the value of > "/repeater/?wicket:interface=:8:oir:17:toggleHighlite:2:ILinkListener::", the > result would be the same as the value of "/repeater/". > I was able to fix it by applying the query parameters as "real" parameters to > the javax.portlet.PortletURL for Action and Render-URLs (see Patch for > PortletRequestContext). > After that I had the same problem with form-submission. The form-values came > in perfectly to the model, but after leaving the ACTION-PHASE the state was > all gone in RENDER-PHASE. > So I did the same in WicketPortlet.processActionResponseState and applied all > wicketURL-query parameteters to the response (setRenderParameter). see Patch > for WicketPortlet. > Another solution could be a PortletRequestWrapper within the WicketFilter > implementation. Or does anybody have a better idea? > It would be really great to see this issue fixed in wicket 1.4! > I'll keep on testing the next days with the ajax examples (some worked > already with the provided patch applied) and WPS 6.1... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.