If I may pitch in briefly here, believe it or not, there is a lot of
enterprises out there whom think that anything that isn't version 1.0
isn't worth considering, let alone deploying (doesn't make sense, but
some people are like that). Hence, from a market adoption point of view,
Apache Hadoop is currently hindered by that. So unless we think Hadoop
isn't operationally ready yet (which I think we agree isn't the case),
the sooner we adopt the 1.0 labeling the better, as we all want to see
Hadoop adopted in more and more places.
My 2 cents,
-- amr
On 3/31/2010 9:06 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Allen Wittenauer wrote:
The fact that there are a *ton*
of admin tool changes/fixes/additions in the Yahoo! Distribution of 0.20
(and quite a few in CDH) should be the big hint that Apache 0.20 is
*not*
1.0.
Right. I'm proposing we make a 1.0 release that tries to match what
folks are actually using in production and clarifies what APIs may be
relied upon to be stable going forward.
Doug
