I’m less convinced. I’ve hit at least one pretty serious JVM bug in JDK 11, so there is value in enabling JDK 9 and 10 even with blockers on JDK 11.
That said, I’d be surprised if the work items for JDK 9 and 10 aren’t a strict subset of the issues getting to JDK 11. .. Owen > On Nov 5, 2018, at 6:14 AM, Kihwal Lee <kih...@oath.com.INVALID> wrote: > > +1 It makes sense to converge on the LTS version. > Thanks for the initiative. > > 73 > Kihwal > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:10 PM Takanobu Asanuma <tasan...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed in HADOOP-11123, we stop fixing incompatibilities of JDK9 and >> JDK10, and would like to focus on supporting JDK11. >> This week, I plan to close HADOOP-11123(Support Java 9) and >> HADOOP-11423(Support Java 10) as duplicate/superceded, and move the >> unresolved sub-tasks to under HADOOP-15338(Support Java 11). >> >> If there are any opinions, please reply this email or comment on the jiras. >> Any help for supporting upcoming JDK would be highly appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> - Takanobu >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
