Thanks Wei-Chiu. > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1 (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some) please shout out.
Although not marked critical, I believe HDFS-15982 could get in 3.3.1 if you are fine. Thanks to Bhavik for filing this. > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. I agree we should work on this to upgrade some dependencies from known CVEs (e.g guava). However, does this mean Hadoop 3.3.1 has dependency on hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0? (as we would like to upgrade guava and other shaded thirdparty dependencies for 3.3.1 as well) On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello, reviving this thread. > > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122 > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647> > > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't > really blocking us. > > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1 > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some) > please shout out. > > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release. > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu > > > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to > trunk > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose. > > > > I think it's good time to add this feature. > > > > Thanks > > Hemanth Boyina > > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vinayakum...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > >> Still hoping for help here: > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790 > > > > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two). > > > > > > -Vinay > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <dam6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Still hoping for help here: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790 > > > > > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it > forward. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran > > > <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a > > release, > > > as > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all > > quirks > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any > > regressions > > > on > > > > > IPv4? > > > > > > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr < > > > > > muralikrishna.dm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Brahma, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last > > mail, > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have > > done > > > a > > > > > good > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and > > used > > > > by > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a > > good > > > > time > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr < > > > > > > muralikrishna.dm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Brahma, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery > > with > > > > > retry > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1 > > > > release. I > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula < > > > > > bra...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the > > > stability > > > > > we > > > > > > >> can > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <stbi...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been > > using > > > > > these > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in > bigger > > > > > > clusters. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse - > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749 > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node - > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > > >> > Bilwa > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula < > > > > > bra...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply.. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody > > has > > > > some > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan < > > > > sun...@apache.org> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu, > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran > > > > > > >> >> > <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little > > > hackathon > > > > > > >> where we > > > > > > >> >> > try > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review > time > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > >> >> people > > > > > > >> >> > > with > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the > code > > > > > (Stack?) > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon, > > > > > testing). > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks, > > > > > > >> >> > > S > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena < > > > > > ayush...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1 > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release > > > > hadoop-thirdparty > > > > > > too > > > > > > >> >> > before. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang < > > > > > > >> weic...@apache.org > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as > > of > > > > now > > > > > > >> we've > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number > > of > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers > > > > > > >> >> > > are > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the > guava > > > > > version > > > > > > >> >> > conflict > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20 > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before > > the > > > > > diff > > > > > > >> >> becomes > > > > > > >> >> > > even > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are currently only two real > > blockers > > > > > for a > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1 > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > ) > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 1. HDFS-15566 < > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 2. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 1. HADOOP-17112 < > > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112 > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 2. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the > 3.3.1 > > > RM? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the > > ARM > > > > > build > > > > > > >> >> > process. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -Vinay > > > > > >