Hello it's me again. While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well. Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790 https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767
I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have much progress today. Thanks all! Weichiu On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Billie and Viraj, > > As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1) > There are so many new features ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I > counted 10, that it is barely a dot release. > > Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd > like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent > releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter > would make sense IMO. > > Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze > date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an > RC. > > Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth > stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'. > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1. >> >> Billie >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang >> <weic...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Hello, reviving this thread. >> > >> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release. >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122 >> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647 >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647> >> > >> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop >> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't >> > really blocking us. >> > >> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in >> 3.3.1 >> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed >> some) >> > please shout out. >> > >> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. >> There >> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread >> for >> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release. >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina < >> hemanthboyina...@gmail.com >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu >> > > >> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to >> > trunk >> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have >> made >> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we >> have >> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested >> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in >> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose. >> > > >> > > I think it's good time to add this feature. >> > > >> > > Thanks >> > > Hemanth Boyina >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vinayakum...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi David, >> > > > >> > > > >> Still hoping for help here: >> > > > >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790 >> > > > >> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two). >> > > > >> > > > -Vinay >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <dam6...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hello, >> > > > > >> > > > > Still hoping for help here: >> > > > > >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790 >> > > > > >> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it >> > forward. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran >> > > > <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a >> > > release, >> > > > as >> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all >> > > quirks >> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any >> > > regressions >> > > > on >> > > > > > IPv4? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr < >> > > > > > muralikrishna.dm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Brahma, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the >> last >> > > mail, >> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We >> have >> > > done >> > > > a >> > > > > > good >> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable >> and >> > > used >> > > > > by >> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is >> a >> > > good >> > > > > time >> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr < >> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM >> discovery >> > > with >> > > > > > retry >> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1 >> > > > > release. I >> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula < >> > > > > > bra...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the >> > > > stability >> > > > > > we >> > > > > > > >> can >> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st < >> stbi...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma, >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been >> > > using >> > > > > > these >> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in >> > bigger >> > > > > > > clusters. >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse - >> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749 >> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node - >> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169 >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula < >> > > > > > bra...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply.. >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if >> anybody >> > > has >> > > > > some >> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included. >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan < >> > > > > sun...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu, >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning? >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks >> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack < >> st...@duboce.net> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran >> > > > > > > >> >> > <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little >> > > > hackathon >> > > > > > > >> where we >> > > > > > > >> >> > try >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review >> > time >> > > > from >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > >> >> people >> > > > > > > >> >> > > with >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the >> > code >> > > > > > (Stack?) >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, >> hackathon, >> > > > > > testing). >> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > S >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena < >> > > > > > ayush...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release >> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty >> > > > > > > too >> > > > > > > >> >> > before. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of >> it. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang < >> > > > > > > >> weic...@apache.org >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, >> and as >> > > of >> > > > > now >> > > > > > > >> we've >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A >> number >> > > of >> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers >> > > > > > > >> >> > > are >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the >> > guava >> > > > > > version >> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20 >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 >> before >> > > the >> > > > > > diff >> > > > > > > >> >> becomes >> > > > > > > >> >> > > even >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are currently only two real >> > > blockers >> > > > > > for a >> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1 >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > ) >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 1. HDFS-15566 < >> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 2. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 1. HADOOP-17112 < >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112 >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 2. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the >> > 3.3.1 >> > > > RM? >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe >> the >> > > ARM >> > > > > > build >> > > > > > > >> >> > process. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: >> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> -- >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> -- >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > -Vinay >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
