[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12751582#action_12751582
]
Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-5073:
-------------------------------------
Yes, in the actual patch we would have to repeat Documented and Inherited on
each. That doesn't seem to me to be a problem. My only concern with using
value is that a term like target is more descriptive of what we're describing -
who is the target of this LimitedPrivate section. But again, it's not a big
point.
As for using Audience as a class or annotation, I don't think class is the
correct way to go, but I'm not going to argue the point any more.
> Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and
> stability
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5073
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sanjay Radia
> Assignee: Sanjay Radia
> Attachments: 5073_demo.png, c5073_20090825.patch, c5073_20090825.png,
> HADOOP-5073.patch, Nested.png, Picture 1.png
>
>
> This jira proposes an interface classification for hadoop interfaces.
> The discussion was started in email alias core-...@hadoop.apache.org in Nov
> 2008.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
