touchida commented on a change in pull request #2585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2585#discussion_r595280493



##########
File path: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/erasurecode/rawcoder/TestDecodingValidator.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.hadoop.io.erasurecode.rawcoder;
+
+import org.apache.hadoop.io.erasurecode.ECChunk;
+import org.apache.hadoop.io.erasurecode.ErasureCodeNative;
+import org.junit.Assert;
+import org.junit.Assume;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import java.util.stream.IntStream;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+
+/**
+ * Test {@link DecodingValidator} under various decoders.
+ */
+@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
+public class TestDecodingValidator extends TestRawCoderBase {
+
+  private DecodingValidator validator;
+
+  @Parameterized.Parameters
+  public static Collection<Object[]> data() {
+    return Arrays.asList(new Object[][] {
+        {RSRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 6, 3, new int[]{1}, new int[]{}},
+        {RSRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 6, 3, new int[]{3}, new int[]{0}},
+        {RSRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 6, 3, new int[]{2, 4}, new int[]{1}},
+        {NativeRSRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 6, 3, new int[]{0}, new 
int[]{}},
+        {XORRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 10, 1, new int[]{0}, new int[]{}},
+        {NativeXORRawErasureCoderFactory.class, 10, 1, new int[]{0},
+            new int[]{}}
+    });
+  }
+
+  public TestDecodingValidator(
+      Class<? extends RawErasureCoderFactory> factoryClass, int numDataUnits,
+      int numParityUnits, int[] erasedDataIndexes, int[] erasedParityIndexes) {
+    this.encoderFactoryClass = factoryClass;
+    this.decoderFactoryClass = factoryClass;
+    this.numDataUnits = numDataUnits;
+    this.numParityUnits = numParityUnits;
+    this.erasedDataIndexes = erasedDataIndexes;
+    this.erasedParityIndexes = erasedParityIndexes;
+  }
+
+  @Before
+  public void setup() {
+    if (encoderFactoryClass == NativeRSRawErasureCoderFactory.class
+        || encoderFactoryClass == NativeXORRawErasureCoderFactory.class) {
+      Assume.assumeTrue(ErasureCodeNative.isNativeCodeLoaded());
+    }
+    setAllowDump(false);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Test if the same validator can process direct and non-direct buffers.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testValidate() {
+    prepare(null, numDataUnits, numParityUnits, erasedDataIndexes,
+        erasedParityIndexes);
+    testValidate(true);
+    testValidate(false);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Test if the same validator can process variable width of data for
+   * inputs and outputs.
+   */
+  protected void testValidate(boolean usingDirectBuffer) {
+    this.usingDirectBuffer = usingDirectBuffer;
+    prepareCoders(false);
+    prepareValidator(false);
+
+    performTestValidate(baseChunkSize);
+    performTestValidate(baseChunkSize - 17);
+    performTestValidate(baseChunkSize + 18);
+  }
+
+  protected void prepareValidator(boolean recreate) {
+    if (validator == null || recreate) {
+      validator = new DecodingValidator(decoder);
+    }
+  }
+
+  protected void performTestValidate(int chunkSize) {
+    setChunkSize(chunkSize);
+    prepareBufferAllocator(false);
+
+    // encode
+    ECChunk[] dataChunks = prepareDataChunksForEncoding();
+    ECChunk[] parityChunks = prepareParityChunksForEncoding();
+    ECChunk[] clonedDataChunks = cloneChunksWithData(dataChunks);
+    try {
+      encoder.encode(dataChunks, parityChunks);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      Assert.fail("Should not get Exception: " + e.getMessage());
+    }
+
+    // decode
+    backupAndEraseChunks(clonedDataChunks, parityChunks);
+    ECChunk[] inputChunks =
+        prepareInputChunksForDecoding(clonedDataChunks, parityChunks);
+    markChunks(inputChunks);
+    ensureOnlyLeastRequiredChunks(inputChunks);
+    ECChunk[] recoveredChunks = prepareOutputChunksForDecoding();
+    int[] erasedIndexes = getErasedIndexesForDecoding();
+    try {
+      decoder.decode(inputChunks, erasedIndexes, recoveredChunks);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      Assert.fail("Should not get Exception: " + e.getMessage());
+    }
+
+    // validate
+    restoreChunksFromMark(inputChunks);
+    ECChunk[] clonedInputChunks = cloneChunksWithData(inputChunks);
+    ECChunk[] clonedRecoveredChunks = cloneChunksWithData(recoveredChunks);
+    int[] clonedErasedIndexes = erasedIndexes.clone();
+
+    try {
+      validator.validate(clonedInputChunks, clonedErasedIndexes,
+          clonedRecoveredChunks);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      Assert.fail("Should not get Exception: " + e.getMessage());
+    }
+
+    // Check if input buffers' positions are moved to the end
+    verifyBufferPositionAtEnd(clonedInputChunks);
+
+    // Check if validator does not change recovered chunks and erased indexes
+    verifyChunksEqual(recoveredChunks, clonedRecoveredChunks);
+    Assert.assertArrayEquals("Erased indexes should not be changed",
+        erasedIndexes, clonedErasedIndexes);
+
+    // Check if validator uses correct indexes for validation
+    List<Integer> validIndexesList =
+        IntStream.of(CoderUtil.getValidIndexes(inputChunks)).boxed()
+            .collect(Collectors.toList());
+    List<Integer> newValidIndexesList =
+        IntStream.of(validator.getNewValidIndexes()).boxed()
+            .collect(Collectors.toList());
+    List<Integer> erasedIndexesList =
+        IntStream.of(erasedIndexes).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
+    int newErasedIndex = validator.getNewErasedIndex();
+    Assert.assertTrue(
+        "Valid indexes for validation should contain"
+        + " erased indexes for decoding",
+        newValidIndexesList.containsAll(erasedIndexesList));
+    Assert.assertTrue(
+        "An erased index for validation should be contained"
+        + " in valid indexes for decoding",
+        validIndexesList.contains(newErasedIndex));
+    Assert.assertFalse(
+        "An erased index for validation should not be contained"
+        + " in valid indexes for validation",
+        newValidIndexesList.contains(newErasedIndex));
+  }
+
+  private void verifyChunksEqual(ECChunk[] chunks1, ECChunk[] chunks2) {
+    boolean result = Arrays.deepEquals(toArrays(chunks1), toArrays(chunks2));
+    assertTrue("Recovered chunks should not be changed", result);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Test if validator throws {@link InvalidDecodingException} when
+   * a decoded output buffer is polluted.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testValidateWithBadDecoding() throws IOException {
+    prepare(null, numDataUnits, numParityUnits, erasedDataIndexes,
+        erasedParityIndexes);
+    this.usingDirectBuffer = true;
+    prepareCoders(true);
+    prepareValidator(true);
+    prepareBufferAllocator(false);
+
+    // encode
+    ECChunk[] dataChunks = prepareDataChunksForEncoding();
+    ECChunk[] parityChunks = prepareParityChunksForEncoding();
+    ECChunk[] clonedDataChunks = cloneChunksWithData(dataChunks);
+    try {
+      encoder.encode(dataChunks, parityChunks);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      Assert.fail("Should not get Exception: " + e.getMessage());
+    }
+
+    // decode
+    backupAndEraseChunks(clonedDataChunks, parityChunks);
+    ECChunk[] inputChunks =
+        prepareInputChunksForDecoding(clonedDataChunks, parityChunks);
+    markChunks(inputChunks);
+    ensureOnlyLeastRequiredChunks(inputChunks);
+    ECChunk[] recoveredChunks = prepareOutputChunksForDecoding();
+    int[] erasedIndexes = getErasedIndexesForDecoding();
+    try {
+      decoder.decode(inputChunks, erasedIndexes, recoveredChunks);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      Assert.fail("Should not get Exception: " + e.getMessage());
+    }
+
+    // validate
+    restoreChunksFromMark(inputChunks);
+    polluteSomeChunk(recoveredChunks);
+    try {
+      validator.validate(inputChunks, erasedIndexes, recoveredChunks);
+      Assert.fail("Validation should fail due to bad decoding");
+    } catch (InvalidDecodingException e) {
+      // Expected

Review comment:
       @ferhui Thanks for your suggestion! Added at dc3fb05.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to