On 08/04/2010 12:30 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
On Aug 4, 2010, at 8:38 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Anyone know if there's any particular reason why the new Partitioner
class doesn't implement JobConfigurable? (And, if not, whether there's
any plans to fix this omission?) We're working on a somewhat complex
partitioner, and it would be extremely helpful to be able to pass it
some parms via the jobconf.
The short answer is that it doesn't need to. If you make your
partitioner either Configured or JobConfigurable, it will be configured.
The API class doesn't depend on it precisely because it is not required
for all partitioners.
-- Owen
? Not sure I understand correctly ... can you pls clarify?
So if I make my custom partitioner implement JobConfigurable, then its
configure(JobConf) method will automagically get called and allow me to
configure it with info in the jobConf that's passed in? (Note that
making it extend from Configured is not an option, since it needs to
extend from org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Partitioner.)
Thanks,
DR
