Rob, yes, foolish.... the second interface is not necessary. I review my code and simplify it....
M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:37 PM Subject: Re: selfconfiguring objects patch for digester > On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 06:23 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > take your time. > > > > The reason for me to change the basic rules is, that it is transparent to > > existing code. You will see that instantly when you look at the code. > > i'm a bit confused about why you need another interface as well as Rule. > isn't it better to keep Rule and use the digester instance to to find the > information you want to pass into the Self Configuration? or even better, > why doesn't the self configuring object look up the information it needs > >from the digester instance? > > - robert > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
