on 12/17/01 11:51 AM, "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aha! Then I'd better keep my eye on Torque. ;-) Having the framework handle > the more complex situations, such as joined tables, is what would make it > really valuable. Avoiding the grunt work for the easy stuff is nice, but > doing the same for the complex stuff is much more compelling. (Any idea on > timeframe, Jason?) > > -- > Martin Cooper Torque handle's joined tables just fine. Torque can do almost everything one could possibly need. It isn't always the cleanest, but it does a shit load more than coding it by hand...and it is open source...you can always modify and contribute to it. We have proven the Torque model in Scarab which has a fairly complex database Schema with some pretty heavy joins and database logic in places. Torque has held up quite well. <teasing> I wonder when Craig will tie Struts to JDO so that his Sun stock will raise when people have to buy JDO to use Struts. :-) </teasing> -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
