Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > >>> I don't see why the basis isn't Intake. Why not work to move Intake to >>> commons and then work towards a framework independent implementation in >>> Commons? >> >> Thanks for volunteering. > > No. I see it as David volunteering and the Jakarta project as management. > However, we don't have any management...hence why I think that things are > messed up. > > [snip] > > Ok, I -1 the inclusion of his code as the validation framework for the > Commons project in favor of using Intake as the basis.
Sigh. Last month, I was saddened by the following: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-dev&m=100774773017395&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-dev&m=100775120900436&w=2 This month, I am saddened by someone using his -1 to block progress towards contributing a reusable and independent code base to the commons. You want to know how management decisions are made? We have a person volunteering to do the work based on the struts code base. Unless there is a better offer out there, I see a rather easy management decision to make. And that is coming from someone who tends towards non-intervention. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
