James, Folks, >> Very minor comment, how about renaming altrmi-tests.xml to be just >> tests.xml. It saves some typing when running stuff. Maybe it could >> set a new >> trend; build.xml is for building stuff and tests.xml is for various test >> programs. >> > Rename : will do. It is separate primarily because there is an ant > task created which cannot be used in the build file that creates it :-(
Done. The targets have different names too now. See the readme or do a -projecthelp on ant. >> >> Another minor comment, some of the core APIs of AltRMI use Altrmi in the >> interface names; how about removing them, since afterall the >> classes/interfaces are in altrmi packages. >> > True. There is always a compromise between namespace on classnames. > My feeling is that "Connection" "Component" and "Document" are very > over used as class names and should definately be prefixed for futher > definitions. (Intellij's IDEA can be too suggestive for those). In > short yes, Perhaps some of the Altrmi prefixes for class names should go. About 10 things renamed now.... >> >> e.g. >> >> AltrmiInvocationHandler -> InvocationHandler. >> > Vote against as that's already used in the JDK. > >> AltrmiRequest -> Request >> > No, because it's too simple a word. It was the firsat thing to be > renamed from Request to AltrmiRequest. But not those two... :-) If enough people think it is best to purge Altrmi as prefic from all classes then I'll do it. At the moment its 1 for, 1 against.... Regards, - Paul H -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
