Hmm, actually I spent some time this week with jetspeed/turbine/torque and, well, I kinda felt that I was looking from something that I could 'plug-in' vs. a development framework.
Altho, Turbine wld i guess match my comment of a 'struts for the backend', I guess I need to narrow it down more towards a specific bean <-> database persistence framework. I am checking out tho, the other 2 links that were sent earlier. Thanks to all -----Original Message----- From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 3/11/2002 2:59 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Cc: Subject: Re: Db bean issue jakarta-turbine-torque john mcnally Jason R Lee wrote: > > Hello anyone who's out there, > > I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on >it. It concerns beans & db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta >proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end. > > I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on EJB and non-EJB projects, I'm not >convinved EJB is any more scalable or distributable than a good implementation of >data aware beans - or something along those lines. > > I helped design a quite popular, big air travel site that took a non-EJB approach >and worked well and scaled across 15 Sun boxes without a hitch. However, the >implementation was a little complex and now that I'm working on another project, I'd >like to have the same thing at a simpler level. > > So I guess I'm just kinda saying hi to the Commons proj and trying to see if anyone >has thought about this issue. Especially since there is no Jakarta sub-project or >Commons portion addressing this issue. > > Thanks and hi, > > - Jason > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<winmail.dat>>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
