Okay, Okay, I give up. I'll get rid of the 1.3 specific calls. The reason they got used in the first place was because the JavaDoc for the java.net.URL class doesn't have an @since tag for the methods that got added in 1.3.
Add this to list of issues to be resolved prior to a 2.0 final release. Marc Saegesser > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient > > > Hello Costin, > > > Sorry for giving this impression - I usually advocate > > maintaining JDK1.1 > > compatibility whenever is possible, and at least at the API > > level ( with > > anything up to 1.4 in the implementation, as long as the > > feature can also > > be implemented in 1.1 ). > > I'll stand next to you on this. :) > > > The current definition of 'run anywhere' seem to include > only the 3-4 > > platforms supporting the last JVM, and the 'portability' of > > java seem to > > include only the Sun or derived VMs and their few supported > > platforms. > > The 'run anywhere' definition is alreay narrow enough, so > let's make the > 'run anywhere' of HttpClient a bit broader again and revert > to 1.2 API. :) > > Also read my comments on Otis' mail. > > Cheers, > > Ringo > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
