On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jonathan Carlson wrote: > I personally like the Lists, Sets, Collections, etc naming, > too. We could put pass-through methods to > java.util.Collections on the commons.Collections class. > That way we can have our cake and eat it too.
"too" implies that Stephen was infavor of Lists, Sets naming, but in that same email: > > After a little thought, I think I favour adding Utils to > > all of the above. ;) > The only people that would have to use the whole path name > would be those who import java.util.*. And I, personally, > think that is a sloppy convention anyways because it makes > it very difficult on new Java developers trying to learn a > system, in addition to Sun's suggestions against it. > > This next idea would be a last resort, but we could come up > with an automatic java.util import generator for those > java.util classes used in the class. It would be > relatively easy to do with regular expressions and the > BeanShell. Too much work for users. I will -1 an org.apache.commons.collections.Collections class. regards, michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
