That's certainly a reasonable request, getting the doc and examples in shape is a major requirement in my book for doing a 1.0 release.
James At 03:04 PM 10/1/2002, Taras Tielkes wrote: >I'm willing to help and contribute to this project in the future. >(Especially where it concerns using this component outside of Struts) > >However, with the current documentation (ahem?), it's hard for me to >even figure out *how* things are supposed to work, let alone see if >they are working correctly. > >What I would really like to see is a sample (no unit test please, >that's not what is needed) that demonstrates most of the functionality >of commons-validator. I'm talking about a small, command-line >application that does some non-trivial validation. Multiple dependant >validations, using localized resources, some custom validations that >return errors in a meaningful way, using commons-validator utility >methods/classes where applicable. > >I think the presence of such a sample would help people understand how >commons-validator can be used. This would again result in more >community participation for this component. (At least, this applies to >myself) > >And yes, this is a bit off-topic for this thread :-) > >Kind regards, > >tt > > > might i suggestion that the validator component considers asking >martin > > and scott to be committers? > > > > they've both volunteered to help with the release and are commons > > committers of good repute but (at the moment) their votes are >non-binding. > > this means that you're still 2 votes short of the quorum you need. > > > > - robert > > > > On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:16 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think it would be great if we could get a DTD into the first >release, as > > > Taras Tielkes suggested. It'd be nice to see his other comments >addressed > > > also, but I wouldn't hold up the first release for them. > > > > > > I can help with the release process if needed. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call) > > >> > > >> > > >> And yea, my first call unto the masses for a vote on a Validator >1.0 > > >> release was met with a deafening silence. So second try: > > >> please vote! > > >> > > >> +1: Finally having a release of Validator sounds good > > >> -1: I have a good reason why now would not be a good time to > > >> do a release > > >> > > >> James > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].> > org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].> > org> > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
