Henri wrote: > I can't fault much of your proposal document. It's well put together and > if functor were to be a separate package, would serve well. +1
> I am worried that there is a time/cost to pay for lots of small components > which have to be release managed, bug managed, documented and checked out > for irregularities. Having a component on its own is a good way to get it > going, but merging components for better dependency handling and > management has pluses once they get going. Especially if they share > developers, scope-domain and users. Our experience with releases shows commons is a release late, release infrequently place. I find it difficult to see how more components, with the same number of people, will help. One possible solution could be for this proposal to be used within [lang] to define the functor package there. Similar 'definition's could be written for other [lang] packages. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
