On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > One point that we would like to see is that commons logging is never a > > *hard* dependency. That means that if commons logging is not in the > > classpath, the package should be able to work correctly, even if with > > logging disabled. > > Please justify this. Is it solely because you have people who refuse to go > near commons-logging, or is there a technical reason? I'm just funked. Ignore this. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
