Re: [Jelly] Pressing on with core release

[robert burrell donkin]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange wrote:

--- robert burrell donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

<snip/>

i think that it'd be ok to go with a jexl beta
providing that it was a
proper beta release rather than just a SNAPSHOT.

It's probably ok, as long as the Java API is stable
and the expression syntax is mostly stable.

if it isn't stable, then go for an alpha :)

on the subject of dependencies, i've just finished
beanutils 1.6.1 which
(hopefully) should work ok with jelly and so you
shouldn't need to rely on
a beanutils SNAPSHOT.

Shouldn't be a problem.  We're already using BeanUtils
1.6 in the Maven build and it works fine.  GUMP also
seems happy with the HEAD.

there is a subtle bug in 1.6 involving dynabeans (i think) that dIon reported and which impacts jelly and maven. this bug i fixed in 1.6.1 and is a major reason why it was released.

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]