On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 14:23, Phil Steitz wrote: > Al Chou wrote: > I actually was thinking the other way around. If you feel strongly > about keeping these things in stat, we can create StatUtils. The point > is to encapsulate these basic functions so that a) users can get them > immediately without thinking about our stat abstractions and b) we can > get the storage-based computations of the basic quantities in one place.
+1 > When the UnivariateImpl window is finite, it should use the same > computations that AbstractStoreUnivariate does -- this is why we need to > encapsulate. +1 I agree with both of these ideas. I think that putting everything in MathUtil might become unwieldy - no problem with creating a StatUtil. (If that hasn't already been done, I'm checking my email for the first time in days) Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
