--- Juozas Baliuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see it was a very big mistake to add AbandonedObjectPool, it was added > for > debugging but people misunderstanding it. > I think we need to deprecate or remove it.
It's already deprecated. David > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:43 AM > Subject: RE: DBCP status? > > > > > This entire thread has been filled with reasons to not support > closing > > > abandoned connections. If you need to have this behavior, you will > need > > > to customize DBCP for your apps because it should not be built in. > > > > Actually, I would characterize it that abandoned connection handling > is an > > FAQ item *and* a polarizing one. Yes, there have been reasons to not > > support closing abandoned connections. And just as loudly have been > people > > saying that they need it. > > > > Personally, I am still in a listening mode (plus I've been head down > working > > on a new server deployment). I've some thoughts, but I also knew that > Serge > > was off-line for a bit (and had a bunch of changes already on his > local > > drive), so I was waiting for him to return, too. > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
