On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:

> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:57:02 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LANG] (patch) LICENSE location problem in build.xml
>
>
> Unsure if we want that or not. ../LICENSE means that everyone shares that
> file in Commons. I think there's a ../LICENSE.txt, so if we want that for
> Windows users then maybe we ought to be using that one rather than
> maintaining our own licence.
>

For what it's worth, I've been making the proposed change (to use a local
copy of LICENSE.txt instead of "../LICENSE") in the Commons packages that
I deal with.  It makes the process of checking out and building individual
packages much easier, at the (small enough to not matter, IMHO) cost of
having to update the copyright year in one extra file per package.

Craig


> I'll start up a new thread on the Commons dev list about it. See if anyone
> cares much.
>
> Hen
>
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm building Debian package of commons-lang and found that the build.xml
> > try  to copy  ../LICENSE file  instead  of LICENSE.txt.  I attached  the
> > simple patch (replace the two occurences).
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
> >    Formateur Cellule Programmation.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to