"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > For what it's worth, I've been making the proposed change (to use a > local copy of LICENSE.txt instead of "../LICENSE") in the Commons > packages that I deal with. It makes the process of checking out and > building individual packages much easier, at the (small enough to not > matter, IMHO) cost of having to update the copyright year in one extra > file per package.
Well, be aware that it's impossible to build commons-lang and commons-el directly from the downloaded sources because of LICENSE file is not where ant think it would be (and not the same name). As the Debian maintainer of the commons-lang, I had to patch it to build. So the minimum I can do is to give you a feed back with the patch ;) Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]