1 inline comment. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 16:55 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release? > > Objections with RC4 ;-) > > 1) Binary ZIP has wrong CRLF when viewed on windows (License.txt and > Release-notes.txt). Source ZIP is fine. > > 2) Source ZIP does not contain pre-built JAR file. (I know it doesn't have > to, but in my experience I much prefer it when it does. No javadocs, just > the commons-lang.jar file > > 3) If we are changing differenceAt(), we should do it now. But you could > argue whether difference() should be something like > substringAfterDifference(). At the moment I'm -0 to changing, preferring > to > push the release.
I've changed it already. This can be backed out of course. There are 2 'diff' APIs, I was only talking/changing the one that was the most offensive to my sensibilities :-P Gary > > Otherwise, release looks good at a quick look. > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:52 PM > Subject: RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 release? > > > > > > I've just rebuilt and remavend etc all the bits for Lang 2.0 under JDK > > 1.4.2 under Linux. > > > > I've not bothered with the <id> thing in the project.xml, we don't care > > about getting that right for 2.0's release. > > > > How does that look? Should we call a vote? > > > > [Maven site will be up there in a bit] > > > > Hen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
