The util package is still in there, it should not (4 +1's on not including it).
Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 05:15 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release? > > > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > >>How does that look? Should we call a vote? > > > > I would fix Stephen's 1) and possibly 2), rebuild including Gary's > > recent commit addressing 3) and then call for a vote (before someone > > finds something else ;). The javadoc on the maven site now looks fine. > > Must have been a JDK bug. > > 1) .zip binary should now be binary, I'd screwed up the ant script. > 2) The source packages now have a jar file in the top directory. > 3) I missed one commit of Gary's, fixing his name in various places. > > So, I'll rebuild again to get Gary's changes, but without the checkstyle > fixes, then call a vote. > > > Should I wait until you cut the release to commit my maven build > > changes? I notice that project.xml, maven.xml etc are included in the > > source disto. > > I'll just ignore them :) The current maven stuff builds the jar, which is > the important part for that at the moment. > > In a couple of hours [gotta get to work]. > > Hen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
