On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So, without further ado, I'll repeat my call for a VOTE last May. > > From what I'm reading, a release makes sense, but what is this group's > policy regarding making changes during the vote? I know that it is just a > bit of cleanup (a few wholely appropriate method renames, and improved > javadocs). There's a 2_0 tag on the CVS which represents the release material, so continued development shouldn't affect that. The last change for 2.0 that wasn't a javadoc change, or related to the release process was on Thursday night, when a unreleased method was renamed. There have been 2.1/3.0 commits in terms of improvement to the Maven files. What I've been doing since the Thursday night tagging was to cvs tag the javadoc-fixed files to 2_0 [after checking the change was 'harmless'], but I know this is a bit of a hackish approach. With the couple of cvs commits we've had since the call for a vote, I was planning to add them onto the tag as well. With all the slowness on the Apache servers due to the virus [took 3 hours for the VOTE to actually arrive in my inbox], I've been figuring I'd leave the VOTE open for a -1 until Monday night EST. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
