--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a 2_0 tag on the CVS which represents the release material, so > > continued development shouldn't affect that. > > > What I've been doing since the Thursday night tagging was to cvs tag > the > > javadoc-fixed files to 2_0 [after checking the change was 'harmless'], > > but I know this is a bit of a hackish approach. With the couple of cvs > > commits we've had since the call for a vote, I was planning to add them > > onto the tag as well. > > Based on the nature of them, assuming that your unit tests run, that > seems > reasonable. I was just curious about the policy. The httpd group, for > example, seems to have stricter rules on a Release vote. > > --- Noel >
Well, if there is a question about policy/process, why not just freeze the code and restart the vote? Phil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
