Re: [jexl] size method unit test failing

[Geir Magnusson Jr .]

I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the artificial  
notion of the length field, or just ask people to use size().  'length'  
is really weird, as it doesn't really exist as a field, and only  
applies to arrays.

Why confuse the syntax with an additional way to get size?

geir

On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 06:40 AM, Mark H. Wilkinson wrote:

On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 03:28, Tim O'Brien wrote:
JexlTest line 443: "assertExpression(jc, "array.length", new  
Integer(5));"

This is failing because (from what I'm seeing), length isn't given  
any special
treatment in Parser.jjt.

Any ideas?
I proposed the attached fix a few months back, but geir wanted to
discuss other possible ways of implementing the length function so he
didn't apply it. There's been no progress since then though.
-Mark.

<array- 
length.patch>---------------------------------------------------------- 
-----------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-956-2604(w)
Adeptra, Inc.                                       203-434-2093(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   203-247-1713(m)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]