On Thursday, September 18, 2003 at 12:07:14 (-0400) Harish Krishnaswamy writes: >How about this... > ><service id="..."> ><contribution service-id="..."> ><configuration id="..."> ><contribution configuration-id="..."> > >How do you like this?
I still prefer consistent id naming conventions: <service service-id="..."> <contribution service-id="..."> <configuration configuration-id="..."> <contribution configuration-id="..."> but not sure I like "contribution" instead of "implementation". So, why not: <service service-id="..."> <implementation service-id="..."> <configuration configuration-id="..."> <implementation configuration-id="..."> errr.... Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
