Ok. Initial patch in Bugzilla: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23270
Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:11 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [collections] New Collection > > > Howdy, > Attach it an enhancement request in Bugzilla. And an accompanying test > case would be very nice ;) > > Yoav Shapira > Millennium ChemInformatics > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:52 AM > >To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > >Subject: RE: [collections] New Collection > > > >Ok. The list won't accept the attachment. If anyone wants to review it, I > >will email it to you directly. > >Dave. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:29 PM > >To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > >Subject: RE: [collections] New Collection > > > >Sorry, my patch went missing. Too big? Anyway here it is gzipped. > >Dave > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:16 PM > >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >Subject: RE: [collections] New Collection > >That's what I meant, cheers. > >I found another collection that seems to be a better starting point, > >org.apache.commons.collections.DoubleOrderedMap. So far I have made a > >couple > >of changes to this class: > >1. Changed it to use Comparator's if specified rather than natural > >ordering. > > > >2. Transaction support. > >I have attached an initial patch. This is NOT for committing as I haven't > >finished yet. > >I have a few questions: > >1. Once I've finished, will the patch be applied (based on what I've > >already > >done)? > >2. Roughly when is the next release of Commons-Collections? > >3. There are no decorators specifically for DoubleOrderedMap. Should I > >write > >some? > >Cheers, > >Dave. > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Arun Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:19:03 -0700 > >To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: [collections] New Collection > >Right.... > >That seems to be a good interpretation of the original intent. Should > have > >read the original a little better the first time. > >-AMT > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:13 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [collections] New Collection > >The only problem with SequencedHashMap is that its ordering is based upon > >the insertion order, not the values of the objects added to it or some > >Comparator, such as is needed (at least that's how I interpret "ordering > by > >value" from the original requirements). > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Arun Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:04 PM > >Subject: RE: [collections] New Collection > >You might want to take a look at > >org.apache.commons.collections.SequencedHashMap which combines, for the > >most > >part, the functions of list and map (insertElementAt()) is not available > - > >how does one insert a key, when the value should be at a specific > position? > >The transactional support is definitely not there, but this might give > you > >a > >better starting point for what you desire. > >-AMT > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:07 AM > >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >Subject: [collections] New Collection > >Our application has just changed from requiring JDK 1.1 to JDK 1.3 as a > >minimum. As a result we are looking at switching our implementation of > >using > >Hashtable and Vector to using collections. > >I am going to write a new collection that gives the functionality we > >require > >and once I've finished I want to donate it to commons-collections. I > would > >like some comments on where to start (especially as I don't yet know too > >much about the standard collections API's). The functionality I require > is > >this: 1. Keys and values. ala Hashtable. 2. Ordering by value. ala > Vector. > >3. Indexing by value. ala Vector's indexOf, elementAt and > insertElementAt. > >4. Transactions. i.e. Others won't see changes until commit is called. > >I take it there is no implementation that supplies the above. I was > >initially thinking of either encapsulating or overriding TreeMap, but I > >think that would make the indexing part pretty difficult. But now I think > I > >will just encapsulate or override HashMap. > >Any comments would be gratefully received. > >Cheers. > >Dave. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >________________________________________________________________________ > >This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service > >is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus > >service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > >http://www.star.net.uk > >________________________________________________________________________ > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ > >This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > >service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > >anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > >http://www.star.net.uk > >________________________________________________________________________ > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > communication, and may contain information that is confidential, > proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the > individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, > printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) > intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your > computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
