The prepare releases page saya: "Make sure that there is a complete Apache Software License at the top of each source file".
Should I also include the license in the various package.html files? Strictly speaking I would say so, but I have not seen this done other places like [lang]. Thanks, Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 16:39 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [codec] Release mechanics? > > --- Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim, > > > > I have a [vote] request message prepared for posting... but, I notice > > that > > previous similar vote request messages include a pointer to a > > "~username" > > URL with the content of the RC build. > > > > For example: "The source for this release candidate has been tagged as > > PRIMITIVES_1_0_RC1 and is available for download at > > <http://cvs.apache.org/~rwaldhoff/commons-primitives/RC1/>." > > > > I do not have such a ~ cubby hole, should I request one? How shall I > > proceed? > > You do if you have an Apache email address. Login to cvs.apache.org (it > has several other names as well) and create a public_html directory under > your home directory. You can look at my setup (dgraham) as an example if > you like. I use this document for preparing releases: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/index.html > > David > > > > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 20:12 > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: RE: [codec] should we release a version 1.2 now? > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > o I've Javadoc'd the Hex class and given it 100% unit test coverage > > (see > > > > clover report from a local build). There is also a bug fix in there. > > > > > > > > o The Base64 test code coverage is as close to 100% as it is going > > to > > > get. > > > > The only conditional branch not tested cannot be taken from staring > > at > > > the > > > > code. > > > > > > > > o I've updated various files from "1.1.1-dev" to "1.2-dev" added > > some > > > text > > > > to the release notes. > > > > > > > > The only missing piece that I can see is the need of better for the > > > language > > > > package. Tim, have you looked at this by any chance? > > > > > > > > > > Looked, yes. Acted, no. I think we're close enough to bring 1.2 > > > release to a vote. Gary, if you feel comfortable with that propose > > the > > > vote. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:56 > > > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > > > Subject: Re: [codec] should we release a version 1.2 now? > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a 1.2 > > > > > > > > > > Maybe this time we'll make a release. :-) (I'm notorious for > > > dropping > > > > > the ball lately) > > > > > > > > > > What's left - > > > > > > > > > > 1. Let's make an attempt to increase coverage over the next few > > days - > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/codec/clover/index.html > > > > > > > > > > 2. Build out Javadocs - > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/codec/apidocs/index.html > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Michael Becke wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think 1.2 sounds better as well. URLCodec is also new in this > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > A 1.1.1 release seems no longer appropriate since DigestUtils > > is a > > > new > > > > > > > feature; should we wrap up a 1.2 now? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It feels like we had been planning a 1.1.1 for quite some time > > to > > > > > > > capture > > > > > > > some bug fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ---------------------- > > > > > Tim O'Brien > > > > > Evanston, IL > > > > > (847) 863-7045 > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > Tim O'Brien - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (847) 863-7045 > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
