Re: [codec] Release mechanics?

[robert burrell donkin]

i think that only the source code needs to be licensed in this way. (i  
don't recall seeing licenses on package documentation before.)

BTW if you're thinking of doing full releases then you might find the  
following wiki page of interest.  
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ReleaseManager

- robert

On 12 Nov 2003, at 19:06, Gary Gregory wrote:

The prepare releases page saya: "Make sure that there is a complete  
Apache
Software License at the top of each source file".

Should I also include the license in the various package.html files?

Strictly speaking I would say so, but I have not seen this done other  
places
like [lang].

Thanks,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 16:39
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec] Release mechanics?
--- Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim,

I have a [vote] request message prepared for posting... but, I notice
that
previous similar vote request messages include a pointer to a
"~username"
URL with the content of the RC build.
For example: "The source for this release candidate has been tagged  
as
PRIMITIVES_1_0_RC1 and is available for download at
<http://cvs.apache.org/~rwaldhoff/commons-primitives/RC1/>."

I do not have such a ~ cubby hole, should I request one? How shall I
proceed?
You do if you have an Apache email address.  Login to cvs.apache.org  
(it
has several other names as well) and create a public_html directory  
under
your home directory.  You can look at my setup (dgraham) as an  
example if
you like.  I use this document for preparing releases:

http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/index.html

David

Thanks,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 20:12
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [codec] should we release a version 1.2 now?
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello,

o I've Javadoc'd the Hex class and given it 100% unit test coverage
(see
clover report from a local build). There is also a bug fix in  
there.

o The Base64 test code coverage is as close to 100% as it is going
to
get.
The only conditional branch not tested cannot be taken from staring
at
the
code.

o I've updated various files from "1.1.1-dev" to "1.2-dev" added
some
text
to the release notes.

The only missing piece that I can see is the need of better for the
language
package. Tim, have you looked at this by any chance?

Looked, yes.  Acted, no.  I think we're close enough to bring 1.2
release to a vote.  Gary, if you feel comfortable with that propose
the
vote.

Thanks,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:56
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec] should we release a version 1.2 now?
+1 for a 1.2

Maybe this time we'll make a release.  :-)  (I'm notorious for
dropping
the ball lately)

What's left -

1. Let's make an attempt to increase coverage over the next few
days -
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/codec/clover/index.html

2. Build out Javadocs -
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/codec/apidocs/index.html
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Michael Becke wrote:

I think 1.2 sounds better as well.  URLCodec is also new in this
release.
Mike

On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:

A 1.1.1 release seems no longer appropriate since DigestUtils
is a
new
feature; should we wrap up a 1.2 now?

It feels like we had been planning a 1.1.1 for quite some time
to
capture
some bug fixes.
Gary



--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
----------------------
Tim O'Brien
Evanston, IL
(847) 863-7045
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Tim O'Brien - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (847) 863-7045
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]