On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Phil Steitz wrote: > Paul Libbrecht wrote: > > Ah, this question is interesting. > > > > I recently removed the dependency on the ../project.xml in Jelly > > because I think checking out a module should produce free-standing things. > > Before being a commons-committer, I always patched the project.xml so > > as to get rid of the project inheritance (which is only for a handful > > of ownership information for the website anyways). > > These are good points. I would be +1 for doing this for [math].
-1 This seems like a bad idea to me. The whole point of doing this was to get some consistency across Commons components. Remember that Commons is ONE Jakarta subproject. It is not, and was never intended to be, a bunch of independent projects. As such, it should have a consistent build system, and a consistent web site. That is not going to happen if all of the components start breaking away from the commonality we have managed to introduce so far. -- Martin Cooper > > <snip/> > > > > > Also, why do you need jakarta-commons/xdocs/ > > My mistake. All is actually needed is jakarta-commons/incl_nav.xml. > > Phil > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
