My screwup then. Hopefully it's not such a big deal that I need to go rectify the few I've fixed wrongly. I'll stop doing it wrong :)
Thanks, Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've found that it does have one feature, which I've been fixing > > manually rather than at source. 1999,2002 seems to become: > > 1999,2002-2004. > > > > I've been manually changing it to 1999-2004, which I presume is > > okay. > > >From what I know, 1999,2002,2004 would be correct since the files > haven't been touched in 2003. Consecutive years get a dash, otherwise > you separate them by comma and leave out the years without changes. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
