#1 is sufficient IMO. #2 leads to scary places. For example, collections should really have a JDK1.4 version that has decorators that add the RandomAccess interface as appropriate. To achieve that and a serializable interface would require 4 classes: - implements RandomAccess, Serializable - implements RandomAccess - implements Serializable - none
Since serializable isn't typically checked by programs, it seems OK to choose #1. Stephen From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > #1 is easy, #2 will take much longer. > > I am short on time today, so I haven't given either much thought. But since > you have, let me ask you this: which way do you feel would be best for the > long term of the project? Which is most consistent and "natural", if > either? > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
