Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> #1 is sufficient IMO.
> #2 leads to scary places.

Well, since you've spent more time looking at this than I have, and I don't
have any strong reason to disagree, I'd go with your approach.  :-)

        --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to