--- Mikhail Krivoshein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I dislike idea to implement independant set of query methods named > >>insert because JDBC doesn't do that. > >>And unfornutatly there is no way to implement Object > >>getGeneratedKeys(ResultSetHandler rsh) because > >>update closes statement object. > >> > >> > > > >Passing a ResultSetHandler into the update() methods to deal with > primary > >keys seems reasonable. > > > So what id your decision? Do you plan to update code with my changes?
The best thing to do is open a bugzilla enhancement ticket with a cvs diff -u formatted patch of the changes plus test cases. Before adding this we need to be sure it will still run on Java 1.3. David > > >>Looking forward for comments. > >>Also I'd like to ask David about JDBC 3.0 support. How do you plan to > >>support JDBC 3.0 features in DbUtils? > >> > >> > > > >What features specifically do you need support for? > > > I just want to know you opinion about how to deal with them. At this > moment I need getGeneratedKeys() only. > But who knows that happens later? > > >I want to keep the releases and builds as simple as possible. That's > why > >we use Proxies for the JDBC interfaces (which are incompatible between > >versions) instead of concrete implementations: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbutils/xref/org/apache/commons/dbutils/ProxyFactory.html > > > Looks like I misunderstand you here. > > Best regards, > Mikhail Krivoshein > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
