[snip] > memory log > ---------- > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27663 > > i quite like this idea but it's not really a major feature. i'm > inclined to try to keep the core jar small by creating another optional > jar called loggers containing loggers which are less likely to be used. > the distribution would contain both jars. maybe avalon log could be > moved there too. [snip]
>From our product's POV, I've always used CL as a thin wrapper to log4j with the remote possibility that we will switch to JDK 1.4 logging when we move from Java 1.3 to 1.4. I have no pb with useful stuff being the jar but it sounds like some of these are new features that are not in the "wrapper" dept, which argues to me for putting it in a separate jar. Then there are questions like: should the "memory log" really be in CL as opposed to logj4? Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
