Re: [logging] after 1.0.4: unfinished business

[robert burrell donkin]

On 21 Jun 2004, at 21:47, Gary Gregory wrote:
[snip]
memory log
----------
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27663
i quite like this idea but it's not really a major feature. i'm
inclined to try to keep the core jar small by creating another
optional
jar called loggers containing loggers which are less likely to be
used.
the distribution would contain both jars. maybe avalon log could be
moved there too.
[snip]
From our product's POV, I've always used CL as a thin wrapper to log4j
with the remote possibility that we will switch to JDK 1.4 logging when
we move from Java 1.3 to 1.4.
I have no pb with useful stuff being the jar but it sounds like some of
these are new features that are not in the "wrapper" dept, which argues
to me for putting it in a separate jar.
Then there are questions like: should the "memory log" really be in CL
as opposed to logj4?
that's a good question :)
the binary distribution is now quite large (due to the improved, 
mavenized documentation). so, as long as the actual core jar stays 
small, i'm a lot happier adding new loggers to an optional jar if 
there's a good chance that people would find them useful but i'd be 
interested to hear other people's opinions on this one...

- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]