Looking at the site rather than the source. Would be nice if javadoc was a link rather than hidden down in the Project Reports.
CLI2Converter confuses me. Firstly, is it still needed? Secondly, why does it have return types of type: org.apache.commons.cli2.Group Would have thought you'd have had compile problems. Something I've had on my todo for a couple of weeks is to javadoc PatternOptionBuilder. Will work on that tonight and commit it. Otherwise, +1. Hen On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Rob Oxspring wrote: > CLI2 has been far too long in the making and has been stable for a long > time so I'd like to propose a beta release to be followed up by some > documentation and a proper release. > > The open bugs mainly refer to 1.0 bugs that I'm nervous of fixing > without breaking something else. Given that the 1.0 code is deprecated > now and the bugs don't appear in 2.0, I expect them to be resolved as > FIXED or WONTFIX once 2.0 is available. > > The documentation still refers to the 1.0 code and needs a major > overhaul. I'm expecting that, with a deadline to work to, I'll get that > well underway in time for the 2.0 release. In the meantime people need > to take cues from the tests and ask for help. > > Anyway, I'd like to release 2.0B1 by Monday Aug 23rd based on the > candidate at http://www.apache.org/~roxspring/cli/. Assuming things go > smoothly I'll propose a real release 2-3 weeks later with improved > documentation. > > Commons-CLI 2.0 Release Plan > ----------------------------------------- > [ ] +1 I support this release and will help > [ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons: > ------------------------------------------ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
