Yeah, no problem. No huge memory leak for 1.0. :) -----Original Message----- From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 6:58 PM To: Hans Gilde Subject: Re: Jelly and a 1.0 release
That sounds like a good idea. I've also been following your work on the memory leak situation, and if it's possible would like to get that into a 1.0 of jelly, as it's a major issue for some people. Sound ok? On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:37:14 -0400, Hans Gilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the public API task should also be put off for 1.1. It seems to me > that any of the suggestions would result in somewhat significant API > changes. We could make it clear in the 1.0 release that the Java API will > change but the Tag libs form a stable XML API. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 1:02 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: Jelly and a 1.0 release > > There's currently one issue in Jira for Jelly Core against v1.0, which > is the public API. > > If there is anything people want fixed for 1.0, please enter it into JIRA > ASAP. > > Please note that the taglibs are now able to be released separately > from Jelly Core, so fixing those is a separate thing to getting the > core released. > > Our focus at the moment is to fix bugs, do documentation and make a > stable Jelly release. Major re-work and API changes should wait till > the 1.1 timeframe. > > The plan is to release 1.0 soon, and not wait a long time like the > beta-3 to beta-4 timeframe. > -- > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
