From: "matthew.hawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Gary Gregory wrote: > > 1st minor: there are a bunch of unnecessary type-casts, I'd like to > > remove those if no one objects. +1
> > 2nd: There is no MutableNumber class. It seems to me that the mutable > > number classes are paralle to java.lang.Number classes and should > > therefore also be subclasssed from a MutableNumber. > > Originally, there was such a class, but after some analysis and > refactoring, it wasn't really doing anything and was nominated for > removal. However, I understand your point. If MutableNumber were to be > resurrected, it would serve only as a marker interface. I'm fine with that. -1, we shouldn't add classes that don't add value to lang. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
