Aha! Now it's all becoming quite clear ;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 4:29 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? > > Huh... is this where I hide in the corner and pretend that I > didn't write > that section of the user's guide? > > > "Charles Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2004 05:20:24 PM: > > <snip> > > > Further, the JCL User Guide has a section labeled "National Language > > Support And Internationalization", in which the following excerpt > > appears: > > > > "NLS internationalization SHOULD be strongly considered for used for > > fatal, error, warn, and info messages. It is generally considered > > optional for debug and trace messages. > > > > Perhaps more direct support for internationalizing log > messages can be > > introduced in a future or alternate version of the Log interface." > > > > So it seems to me that the suggestion from IBM is not > necessarily making > > the "thin bridge" any fatter. Rather, it is simply > following up on what > > is already suggested in the User Guide. > > <snip> > > ******************************************* > Richard A. Sitze > IBM WebSphere WebServices Development > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
